Category Archives: Voices

Human Rights in the Middle East — A Voice from Palestine

July 15, 2008
By 19592

What I will do today will be to serve as a voice for a people whose heritage I share, with the hope that in articulating the suffering of that one group of people I will be shedding light on all types of suffering being experienced by human beings all around the world. I know very well that when I am addressing SYLFF fellows, I am actually addressing souls who are ardently debating issues in societies where the hum of human voices is, in fact, heard. I and others of my generation have the obligation to be the voice of our people because these people have lacked a voice, especially in the United States, and I believe that the current generation of young people around the globe who are like-minded need to be a collective voice for the oppressed wherever oppression occurs. Being a voice is important, but it is not enough. After giving rise to ideas and then articulating them in words, a person or group must recognize the need for action.

When formulating human-rights laws, four points should be kept in mind: (1) UN Charter Article 55 (the UN Bill of Rights, including universal respect for human rights), and making clear the relationship between peace and human rights; (2) These rights are universal; (3) World conferences on human rights issues help to raise awareness of these issues and how important they are; and (4) It is necessary to proliferate these rights by making them more precise and utilizing realistic implementation mechanisms.

I believe that my people have not had their human rights respected since being subject to Israeli occupation 40 years ago. Close your eyes and imagine with me. Imagine yourself tied to a pole with your hands cuffed behind your back and tied to that pole. Your feet also are tied to it. Your eyes are blindfolded and your mouth is taped shut. How would you feel? How would you feel being completely under the control of someone else, having no control of yourself or anything around you? How would you feel being so completely helpless? This is exactly what occupation has done to my people, who are not merely being controlled by the environment around them, but rather being subject to an invasion and control of their souls. This coercive control of the physical and spiritual elements of Palestinians individually and collectively has resulted in widespread violations of their human rights and also has failed to bring security to either the Israeli or Palestinian civilian populations.

That control has manifested itself in various forms, including:

    • Israel’s land grabbing and water grabbing by building the apartheid wall, confiscating arable land, and building and expanding settlements. The wall has created cultural and social divides between the Palestinian people such that a family cannot even get together for a social event.
    • The Israeli checkpoint system is another physical manifestation of the control. Around the West Bank there are about 500 checkpoints, manned by Israeli soldiers. Palestinian people are treated very badly at these checkpoints.
    • There are around 11,000 Palestinian soldiers being held in Israeli jails and detention centers. Some prisoners have been held in “administrative detention” (without being charged with crimes, and without legal recourse) for years. Some 200 female Palestinian prisoners are held inside Israeli jails, some of whom have had to give birth to their children while in captivity, with their children kept imprisoned with them until they are two years old.
    • Israeli settlements are an outrageous grab of Palestinian land and resources. There are 410,305 Israeli settlers living on occupied Palestinian land.
    • About 4,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces and settlers since the beginning of the Second Intifada in 2000.
    • The Israeli practices and the current international boycott placed on the Palestinian people in the wake of the latest Palestinian elections for the legislative council have led to dire humanitarian conditions all over the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

In order to deal with such grave violations of human rights, I believe that there is first a need for courage and vision. The mechanisms implemented by the international organizations—such as monitoring, state reporting, and treaty committees—are essential because they document such violations and raise the international community’s awareness of the violations. It is extremely important to hold countries to their commitments as enshrined in international and bilateral agreements, and such agreements should include clauses that respect and safeguard human rights. I wish to conclude by quoting the late U.S. President John F. Kennedy, who rightly said, “United … there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided … there is little we can do … for we dare not meet a powerful challenge, at odds, and split asunder.” Together we, SYLFF fellows and young leaders, can achieve a great deal in facing perpetrators of human-rights violations.

Thank you.

Young Musicians Challenged to Perform in Collaboration — A Joint Project of 3 World-Renowned Music Schools

July 15, 2008
By null

(The following is an excerpt from the SYLFF Newsletter No.21, Aug 2008)

Dorothea Riedel and Wolfgang Klos

 

How the Joint Project was Initiated

Among the 68 SYLFF institutions are 3 music universities representing the world’s top training schools for professional performing artists: the Juilliard School in New York, the Conservatoire national supérieur de musique et de danse de Paris, and the University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna.

These institutions, which for many years have received generous SYLFF endowments via the Tokyo Foundation, have also been able to benefit from the SYLFF Fellows Mobility Program (FMP), which the foundation launched to promote SYLFF fellow exchanges. The 3 schools jointly proposed, as an FMP project, a challenging exchange program in the field of chamber music. This full-of-spirit project, known as the SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar, has produced outstanding collaborations between highly educated people in an international language, namely that of music. Each of the 3 schools organized 10-day-long coaching programs, the first of which was held at Juilliard in New York (2006), the second at the Conservatoire in Paris (2007), and the third in Vienna (2008). The highlight and outcome of each coaching program was a joint concert held at each of these cities in turn at the end of its respective 10-day program.

 

Why Chamber Music?

It seemed particularly meaningful for the 3 institutions to cooperate in this field, because many musically knowledgeable individuals regard chamber music as a dialog on the highest spiritual and mental levels. Moreover, one of the advantages of combining the outstanding musical and technical skills of a small number of the most highly developed students is that wonderful results can be obtained from a minimum of resources.

For many decades, chamber music — with its intimate atmosphere and the challenges it offers to not only musicians but also to audiences — stood in the shadow of the more spectacular performances of symphonies and operas. This position of chamber music has changed dramatically within the last few years, mainly due to sociological and financial reasons. Music universities reacted to this change by offering their graduate students a realistic professional perspective; for example, the University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna launched a Chamber Music Institute and a chamber music curriculum on the master’s and doctoral levels that perfectly match actual professional demands. As a result, chamber music was the logical choice for the collaboration between the 3 music universities in the SYLFF network.

Our intention in Vienna was to offer to the audience a concert program that reflects significant works from each of the three cultural areas where the schools are located: Paris, Vienna, and New York. We also wanted to present to our fellow musicians from Juilliard and Paris both the major musical areas for which our university is well-known and the methods that our teachers use, thereby offering the visiting musicians the resources, possibilities, and contacts of our university.

 

The Seminar in Vienna: Its Process and Fruits

The students participating in the seminar were expected to be well-prepared prior to their arrival in Vienna. Their schedule during the program was so full that they had to start working the very next day after arrival. The frequency and intensity of the coaching, and the necessity of the musicians having to work with colleagues they had not previously met, was a kind of training very similar to the actual situations that professional musicians face, and is 1 of the factors that make this program so valuable for the students.

In addition, the SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar is unique in that it gives each student rare opportunities to compare the learning conditions of one’s mother institution with those of another university, to meet new teachers, compare teaching methods, and to compare one’s own artistic level with that of others.

The end of the coaching program in Vienna was a public concert in one of the halls (Gläserner Saal) of the world-famous Musikverein. The performance included masterpieces by Mozart, Debussy, and Gershwin, and lasted almost 3 hours — a very challenging concert, because so many different formations were presented — from a classical wind octet (to collaborate with Viennese horns and oboes was an amazing experience for our friends from New York and Paris) to mixed ensembles (strings, including a harp; wind; and keyboard), and 2 pianos. Thanks to the rigorous professionalism of the intensive practice sessions, rehearsals, and coaching, this concert was an outstanding event.

To attract public attention to our concert was a challenging adventure for the university’s staff because, as one can imagine, in Vienna every night is filled with concerts featuring famous artists. Moreover, Viennese audiences are spoiled and choosy. Therefore, we were all very happy to see that many people came and nearly filled the hall. The concert was a great success. The success was also expressed in the audience’s applause: a well-earned reward for the many days of hard work put in by musicians, teachers, and organizers. The aims of the program — to widen and deepen the professional and cultural perspectives of all concerned, to make new friends, and to develop close relationships among the participating SYLFF fellows from 3 different music schools — were achieved in a wonderful way.

In addition to this ambitious coaching program, the city of Vienna itself, a center of music for hundreds of years, also left a strong impression on our guests. On the very first day, the students of the three music universities who had gathered in Vienna for the SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar were taken on a tour to the city’s major sightseeing spots by a professional tourist guide. Also, with the university being situated close to Vienna’s old city center, the students were able to move around by public transport to explore the city on their own.

On Sunday, which was the only day without rehearsals and training sessions, Professor Wolfgang Klos, former vice-rector and one of the initiators of the project, took students on a special tour to visit very special sites of Vienna’s past: the homes of Mozart and Beethoven, the house where George Gershwin composed his famous work “An American in Paris” (which was part of the final concert’s program), and other places of cultural and historical interest of which Vienna has many. The latter include the cemeteries where Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert, Brahms, and other prominent composers are buried, places from which it is easy to access museums, libraries, and private collections that display autographs and other memorabilia of the respective composers. I am sure that the students felt the special atmosphere of artistic creativity that makes Vienna the world capital of music. That Sunday started with a solemn Catholic service with music performed by our university’s Church Music Department in the baroque-style Church of St. Ursula, one of our university’s buildings. This was a very special service featuring a choir, orchestra, and organ music, which is still thriving in Vienna. The day ended with a typical Viennese dinner in the "heuriger" where Beethoven wrote his famous “Heiligenstadt Testimony.” Everyone could feel the atmosphere of the world famous composer’s spirit that led to the masterpieces that were to be performed as the final concert of this intensive rehearsal period.

 

The Importance of This Kind of Project

This kind of project is important, for many reasons, including the following:

    • New professional challenges need new instructional approaches.
    • To bring together high-level musicians from different cultures is a challenge for all participants (students, staff, administrators), and also represents the reality of a professional musician’s life in the increasingly globalized world of musical arts (though for most of these students, being rather young in age, this was a first grand adventure in that world).
    • Cultural interaction of this intensity among such different training institutions offers a unique opportunity to collaborate at the highest level on an extremely challenging program: a world premiere.

The final concert represented the climax of everyone’s efforts, and it was highly appreciated and enthusiastically applauded by the musically spoiled-for-choice and difficult-to-please audience of the Vienna Musikverein; the concert turned out to be a very rare happening. This kind of joint undertaking actively demonstrates that music is an international language and that the sphere of action of high-level musicians is the world in its entirety. For advanced students of these world-leading music schools in different parts of the world that are connected through the SYLFF network, the opportunity to interact with students, staff, and administrators of the highest artistic level from other countries and cultures was an important step in their professional development.

 

The Significance of Chamber Music Education and Training

The current year’s project has revealed that the SYLFF Chamber Music Seminars are significant in at least the following 2 ways.

1. For society

a. When the students complete their highly professional music education, they will be specialists, perfectly trained to entertain the most demanding audience at the highest level. As musicians they will be able to elevate people from everyday life to an artistic sphere, presenting human feelings and a humanistic and dignified approach to human life.

b. Musically educated individuals reach higher levels in all fields of human education (even in mathematics, as internationally validated studies have indicated for decades) and enrich human society by their very intense lives, broad visions, and wide tolerance.

2. For individual musicians

For the reasons already mentioned above, music education at advanced level leads to personal development that offers to the musician both a more fulfilled life through his or her highly developed craftsmanship (as well as through the difficulties experienced along the way) and an artistic insight into human life that makes him or her more mature and richer in personality.

The ability to create and appreciate the fine arts, especially music as a perfect means of international communication, are major factors that define us as human beings.

 

The SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar 2009

In 2009 Austria will celebrate the bicentennial of Haydn’s death, and therefore the 3 music universities have decided to start the second cycle of the 3-year seminar in Vienna. The SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar 2009 and its final concert will take place at Eszterhazy Castle, where the famous composer and “father” of classical chamber music, Josef Haydn, created his masterpieces over several decades. This will be a new challenge for outstanding young artists from the Juilliard School in New York, the Conservatoire de Paris, and the University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna.

Musiques à trois! — Music for Three!

July 15, 2008
By null

(The following is an excerpt from the SYLFF Newsletter No.18, May 2007)

Gretchen Amussen

From January 24th through February 3rd, 2007, the Paris Conservatoire was the scene of intense music-making as 10 musicians from The Juilliard School and the University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna joined forces with 10 students and seven professors from the Conservatoire to prepare a major chamber music program that was presented on February 1st and 2nd at the Conservatoire, as part of the school’s annual Quinte et Plus (Five and More) chamber music festival. This intensive event was the second of three SYLFF chamber music projects to be held over a three-year period, the first having been held at The Juilliard School in January 2006 under the FMP.

One specific aim of the Paris project was to include professors in the music-making— indeed this is the drawing point for Quinte et Plus, which features a week-long chamber music festival of the highest caliber. Our approach was to feature works by major French composers of the 19th and 20th centuries (Chausson, Poulenc, and the contemporary French composer Michael Levinas, who teaches at the Conservatoire), rounding out the program with works by the American Elliott Carter and the Austrian Strauss-Schoenberg. In order to enable the SYLFF students to mix with as many musicians as possible, each student participated in two chamber music groups—making for no small scheduling feat! Michael Levinas’ work, doubtless the most challenging on the program both for its musical language and ensemble work, necessitated a sizable investment in time by the quintet’s members. Levinas himself attended several rehearsals as well as the final performance, with which he was very impressed.

Above and beyond the intense rehearsing, which occupied a sizable portion of each musician’s time, a city tour was organized for the entire group on the second afternoon; it proved highly popular. Many Viennese and New York students also took time to sit in on classes given by professors of their respective instruments; for the wind players, attending a class for the virtually extinct French bassoon was a high point of their time in Paris.

Barli Nugent, who had helped organize the project at Juilliard, and who is in charge of chamber music there, accompanied that school’s group. She was able to visit classes and participate in meetings with Conservatoire department heads. Barli’s participation in my department’s meeting was seen by us as a high point of the year, and all of us were on our toes to ask questions in English. Many found it inspiring to hear about how issues like professional development are handled so imaginatively in an American institution, and such an outstanding one at that! Barli’s experience as a former Juilliard student, seasoned chamber music player, doctoral student, and now an assistant dean having responsibilities in career development and chamber music, made our exchanges all the more rich. Barli’s warmth and openness added immensely to the project.

The final result was music-making of the highest order. Our SYLFF musicians had the joy of performing for an enthusiastic audience that included the Tokyo Foundation’s Ellen Mashiko, who took time afterwards to speak with each and every one of the participating musicians, sharing her impressions and getting feedback from them. At the post-concert cocktail party, laughter and delight abounded as musicians who had been absolute strangers to one another the week before snapped photos and eagerly sought to jot down e-mail addresses and phone numbers.

The concert took place in this building―Espace Maurice Fleuret―at the Conservatoire de Paris.

The concert took place in this building―Espace Maurice Fleuret―at the Conservatoire de Paris.

In retrospect, were we to do this again —and all of us believe such exchanges are essential for musicians, whose lives are spent on international stages and often interacting with artists whose training and indeed cultural references are quite different— we would probably reduce the number of participating musicians and designate one or two coaches. The complexity of juggling so many people’s schedules—made all the more complicated because the French students also had their regular course load— would simplify things considerably and allow for visiting students to have more time both to visit classes and to get to know Paris.

Nevertheless, we believe that this was and is an absolutely perfect project for music institutions within the SYLFF family, because chamber music is in fact an ongoing conversation that requires that musicians be able to listen to one to another, the best possible musical outcome only successfully reachable if each musician has engaged in this “active listening and performing” in an atmosphere of profound respect for the different artistic approaches being expressed.

All of us are eagerly awaiting year three of the SYLFF chamber music project and a stellar experience in Vienna. For now, we give our heartfelt thanks to Ellen Mashiko and the entire SYLFF team for providing us with this magical opportunity to get to know one another in the best way we know how—by making music!

 

Gretchen Amussen

Gretchen Amussen

Ms. Gretchen Amussen is deputy director of external affairs at the Conservatoire national superieur de musique et de danse de Paris. She studied music and French as an undergraduate student. Her career has included management positions in not-for-profit cultural institutions in the United States and developing an international program and an external affairs division at the Paris Conservatoire. She is an ardent lover of music, loves to travel, and voraciously reads fiction from the many countries she visits. She is particularly interested in how the music profession is evolving (and what this means for training professionals). She serves as the contact person of the SYLFF Steering Committee and is an avid networker in general. Gretchen, was instrumental (no pun intended!) in organizing and implementing the SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar that took place earlier this year at the Paris Conservatoire.

The Path that Led Me Here

July 15, 2008
By 21140

Jimmy Chiang thanking the first violinist after the performance.

Jimmy Chiang thanking the first violinist after the performance.

I left my home in Hong Kong when I was 18 and went to the USA to further my musical study. I later moved with my wife to Vienna, which became our new home, and where our son was born in October 2006. I am the only son in a traditional Chinese family and —despite my parents’ full support —it has not been easy for people around me to feel fully confident that I would succeed as a professional musician, a conductor and pianist. Some 12 years ago, as a teenager with an uncertain future, I decided that by the time I became 30, I would either have already attained international recognition or I would have to get a regular, steady job. Now, as I have just reached the big “3-0”, I can say that I have fulfilled my dream and my promise to myself by winning first prize at the Lovro von Matacic 4th International Competition for Young Conductors held in Zagreb, Croatia, in September 2007.

 

The Lovro Von Matacic Competition

This competition, founded in memory of the renowned Croatian conductor Lovro von Matacic, is held every four years. From among the many outstanding conductors from all over the world, 16 were picked to travel to Zagreb, based on DVD recordings of their performances. It was an intensive week filled with rehearsals, and a fair amount of psychological pressure from having to maintain a constant state of concentration, despite insufficient sleep. Among the 10 international judges who would decide the winner were Berislav Klobucar, Simone Young, and Dimitri Kitajenko.

More than 15 pieces of music, consisting of overtures, symphonies, symphonic poems, opera arias, and Croatian compositions, were to be prepared prior to the remaining rounds of the competition. The pieces that each candidate would conduct were decided by drawing lots before one’s performance, and only a limited amount of time was allowed for rehearsing the pieces. I was given 30 minutes to prepare Wagner’s Rienzi Overture, J. Gotovac’s Symphonic Kolo, and Leonora’s Aria in Beethoven’s Fidelio. Then, for the final round, I was given 50 minutes to prepare Stravinsky’s Firebird (1945) as well as Papandopulo’s Sinfonietta. For the final concert, I conducted Shostakovich’s First Symphony, the performance of which would determine my fate in the competition. I was allowed only one general rehearsal of the Shostakovich piece, on the day of the concert. During the rehearsal I used mainly clear gestures and expressions, without much talking and interruption of the playing, to show the musicians the interpretation that I wanted, and I wondered if my performance could turn out well under such circumstances.

However, upon ending my performance I felt triumphant! From the audience’s passionate reaction after the last chord ended, I immediately knew that I had done exceedingly well. I felt in my heart that I had won, no matter what the judges result might be. There is nothing better than the feeling after a successful performance—a close bonding between me and the orchestra, and a warm crowd cheering in applause! I must admit that this part of the experience was so overwhelming that I showed almost no outward reaction when it was announced that I was the winner. Congratulations, receptions, press interviews, and the like were to follow. Meanwhile, my mind was still occupied with the sounds of Shostakovich, and that continued for the next few days.

 

What I Learned

The competition was an especially significant experience. In addition to having opportunities to rehearse with and conduct a professional orchestra, I made new friends and learned a great deal from watching others. It is wonderful to see how different conductors educated in different countries perform, and through conversations with my colleagues I was impressed by how different the traditions and teachers are, such as the concept of the role of the conductor, the way to approach a piece of music, and so on.

However, I must admit that I have never been a fan of music competitions. Although such competitions as that in Zagreb can confirm one’s music-making capabilities and power as a conductor, I realize that to win always requires some luck, too. In any case, I believe that music is not a sport that one can or should compete in. To appreciate music involves taste as well as many other subjective factors. To be named “winner” therefore does not necessarily say much about the true degree of one’s abilities. For me, the real prize was that I had won the hearts of both the people in the audience and the members of the orchestra. The appreciation of people is a prize that I will have to continue to earn through concerted effort throughout my life.

 

The Path Leading to My Success

Many factors in the first 30 years of my life contributed to my recent success. First, my parents sent me to piano lessons when I was 4 years old, and through their discovery of my musical talent I was able to receive further support and education. Ms. Ching-yee Choi, my first piano teacher for 14 years and her husband, Dr. Wai-hong Yip, who taught me composition when I was 11, were and still are dear to me. Dr. Yip founded the Pan Asia Symphony Orchestra, with which I was able to start my performing career as a concert pianist when I was 13. I am now the principal guest conductor for that orchestra, for which I was also once a cellist. That orchestra will always retain a special value in my life.

After I earned a Fellowship Diploma from Trinity College London (FTCL) at the young age of 16, I decided to go abroad to the USA to continue my education. It was at Baylor University in Texas that I met my second great mentor, pianist Krassimira Jordan. She had studied in Moscow with Emil Gilels, one of the most important representatives of the famous Russian School of piano playing, heritage which I am honored to be a part of. It was through her summer academy and acquaintance with her friend and colleague, Wolfgang Watzinger, that I made my first connection with Vienna, the city of music. Here I became a student of Watzinger, whose teacher was Rudolf Serkin, a major figure in the German school of piano playing in contrast to the Russian techniques. It was my destiny to be able to master the two schools’ techniques, which complement each other so well and which enable me to understand the importance of maintaining a balance between emotion and intellect in my performances, both as pianist and conductor. Amid all of these developments, in Texas in the year 2000 I seized the chance to found my own chamber orchestra, the Ensemble Amadeus Waco, where I developed both conducting as well as organizational skills.

But it was not until I had moved to Vienna and met my other mentor, Leopold Hager, that I considered myself as having begun my understanding of what it means to be a conductor. He tore down not only my preconceived notions about conducting, but my self-assurance. Then he slowly built me back up through the precious tradition of European conductor training, as well as in his specialty—the interpretation of Mozart. I am considered to be his very last student, inasmuch as he has retired from the university and no longer teaches. Moreover, to be home in Vienna is like putting a beautifully prepared gourmet dinner on a beautiful plate for a stunning presentation. Here I am constantly spoiled by the sound of the Vienna Philharmonic as well as experiencing the rehearsals of great living conductors. I can’t complain!

In addition to all of the above, my experience with Maestro Seiji Ozawa at the Rohm Music Festival in Kyoto in 2003 was enormously stimulating. The ideas he sparked in me during that week vividly remain.

Above all, I must mention my dear wife, a wonderful opera soprano, whom I met in the USA while we were students. We have had not just a loving relationship but a singer-coach relationship for almost 10 years. Because of her, I have developed a sensitive ear for voice, which benefits me very much as an opera conductor and had contributed to my work as an opera coach on a daily basis with singers from all over the world.

To conclude, I am certain that I haven’t mentioned everyone and everything that somehow contributed to my success in my first 30 years of life. But I will end by expressing my gratitude to the Tokyo Foundation; the lasting effects of the support the Foundation has given me as a fellow has been like the ripples formed from dropping a stone into the pond of my life and making waves that will have lasting repercussions.

New York, New York …

July 15, 2008
By 19588

(The following is an excerpt from the SYLFF Newsletter No.15, May 2006)

Anna Gutowska

This year’s SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar, the first of three such annual events planned and jointly developed by three SYLFF music schools—the Conservatoire national supérieur de musique et de danse de Paris, the University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna, and The Juilliard School, in New York City—took place at Juilliard from January 9th through 17th, 2006, in conjunction with Juilliard’s ChamberFest; a week of chamber music seminars, coaching, and performances.

As a step leading to participation in the seminar, five of us from our university in Vienna—Bojidara Kouzmanova (violin), Philipp Schachinger (cello), Heidrun (“Heidi”) Wirth (bassoon), David Szalkay (trumpet), and I—met at Vienna Airport on Sunday, January 8th, subsequently arriving in New York City after a long flight.

The seminar started on January 9th. It involved intensive hours of practice and coaching each day. We worked with different coaches on different pieces by a variety of composers, such as Stravinsky, Ives, and Friedmann. Juilliard has some 100 practice rooms, so enough rooms were available for us to practice individually and in groups until 11 p.m.— and some days we did so, meeting only for lunches and dinners. However, our time was not all work. Among the much appreciated ‘extracurricular’ events that Juilliard arranged for us during the seminar were a pizza party and a special Chinese dinner.

I was in a chamber group that also included Helena Madoka Berg and Christian Hacker from Germany, Benedicte Royer from Paris, and Ang Li from China. Helena, Christian, and Ang were students at Juilliard, and Benedicte was a student at the conservatoire in Paris. The piece that we chose to play was Anton Dvorak’s Piano Quintet in A-Major, op. 81, a very famous and wonderful piece that actually is for piano and strings and is also my favorite. We practiced in the morning and afternoon every day.

Our coach was Dr. Yoheved Kaplinsky, chair of the Piano Department of The Juilliard School, from which she had received a doctorate. She has been greatly praised for her musical accomplishments in recitals, chamber music programs, and orchestral performances. Before joining Juilliard, Dr. Kaplinsky taught at the Philadelphia University of the Arts, the Peabody Conservatory, and the Manhattan School of Music. Widely known for her exceptional knowledge of piano techniques, she is in great demand as a teacher of advanced pianists, and she has lectured extensively and judged major musical competitions across the world.

Dr. Kaplinsky provided us with fantastic coaching. She is a very quiet person, but when she is playing, her performance is like fireworks, full of emotion and also very, very warm. I thought that our Dvorak Quintet needed a lot of color and joy, and a little nostalgia, and as a result of her working with us on every element of this piece, we were able to play it in the expressive way that it deserves. I absolutely adore her, and I loved and enjoyed her lessons. Dr. Kaplinsky’s family came from Poland, and I hope that some day she will come to Poland to visit our school. We, the participants in the seminar, had different personalities, were from different countries and cultures, had studied at different schools, embraced different traditions (musical and otherwise), and had different ways of playing. But I think that this “mixture” was fantastic. It gave us many pleasant surprises, as well as much joy and many smiles, and we learned a lot from each other.

The concert in Paul Hall on the final day (January 17th) was held before a large audience, and perhaps it can best be described in these few words: personally satisfying and musically successful! I very much enjoyed performing with my quintet-friends, and, I’m glad to say, our performance was well-received. After the concert Dr. Kaplinsky came to us and said she was proud of us, which of course warmed our hearts and made us feel even more strongly that our hard work and intensive practice had been worthwhile. During the post-concert reception I met people from The Nippon Foundation, the Tokyo Foundation, and the Nippon Music Foundation. I was very happy to see Ms. Ellen Mashiko again after having met her for the first time in July 2005 during the SYLFF Africa/Europe Regional Forum in Coimbra, Portugal.

 

* * *

 

I am now back in Vienna.

My first visit to New York City, in addition to the very rewarding experience of collaborating with other students at Juilliard, was also enjoyable and memorable in other ways. I have many photos that I took while there: Central Park and its squirrels, Manhattan, Ground Zero, Planet Hollywood, the Metropolitan Opera, 34th Street, the Brooklyn Bridge, Chinatown, Times Square, and the Rockefeller Center and its ice rink, among others. Sometimes I look at my photos from my time in New York, and I laugh . . . about David Szalkay, who always had his video camera and was singing Jennifer Lopez songs, and about Bojidara, who was worried about her heavy baggage (she bought a lot of CDs and books in New York). And I remember the wonderful spaghetti party and playing the Uno card game . . . among many, many other memories.

Some of us from Vienna went to Avery Fisher Hall to listen to an open rehearsal of a violin concerto, “The Red Violin,” staged by Joshua Bell and the New York Philharmonic Orchestra, and we also saw a Metropolitan Opera production of the great ballet Swan Lake.

I also fondly remember a dinner at a sushi bar with my Vienna university roommate, Heidi, and Mathieu and Magie from Paris. The weather was very cold, but we were very happy to share time together. Heidi made entries in her diary every day, and we talked whenever we had a chance. We thoroughly enjoyed the 10 days we passed in New York with the fantastic people we met, played with, and heard play there.

I worked very hard. I attended all the seminar sessions, where I learned a lot. I did my best to contribute to the success of the SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar and our quintet’s performance. I hope I will meet all the seminar participants and teachers again someday . . . perhaps even in New York, which I enjoyed a lot.

After spending such an intense, enriching, and wonderful time in New York, a time that was so meaningful to me, I wish, on behalf of all other musicians who performed at the ChamberFest from the three music schools, to express our sincere gratitude to Ellen Mashiko and the Tokyo Foundation for providing us with such a wonderful opportunity and for the trust they placed in us.

I also wish to express my deepest and very respectful thanks to Professor Wolfgang Klos and Ms. Dorothea Riedel of the University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna, for the trust they placed in me and for making it possible for me to take part, first, in the SYLFF Africa/Europe Regional Forum in the summer of 2005, which in turn provided me with the opportunity to perform in the wonderful chamber music concert in the Biblioteca Joanina (King John Library) at the University of Coimbra during that forum, and then, second, in Juilliard’s ChamberFest this past January.

I will never forget New York. I am very, very happy to have had the experiences I did during ChamberFest, and especially to have been able to play and work with musicians and other people from different countries and cultures around the world. I believe that the SYLFF Chamber Music Seminars, by bringing together in this way such different people, with their varied languages and traditions, will help to eliminate misunderstanding and hatred from this unquiet and uneasy world, and bring goodwill and peace instead.

 

Anna Gutowska

A native of Poland, Ms. Anna Gutowska is a SYLFF fellow at the University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna, majoring in violin. She participated in the Asia/Pacific Regional Forum in Coimbra, Portugal, in 2005, and in the SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar that was held in January 2006 at The Juilliard School in New York City. This seminar is the first of three annual seminars, developed under the SYLFF Fellows Mobility Program (FMP), to be held at the three music schools involved.

SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar 2006 at The Juilliard School

July 15, 2008
By null

(The following is an excerpt from the SYLFF Newsletter No.15, May 2006)

Bärli Nugent

January 8th, 2006 was a dreary winter day, but the excitement in the arrivals hall of John F. Kennedy International Airport was palpable. A small group from Juilliard stood behind the barrier, straining to see the travelers emerging from the U.S. Customs section. Five young people had flown through the night from Vienna and landed an hour earlier; five more were soon due in on a flight from Paris. Any string or wind instruments in the crowd? We didn’t know what the students looked like, and we were not sure they would spot the friendly but small, hand-lettered “Juilliard School” signs we were holding. We were eager to welcome them to New York for the start of a project that had been dreamed about and worked on for two years.

This project, later called in this, its inaugural year the ‘SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar at The Juilliard School of the Ryoichi Sasakawa Young Leaders Fellowship Fund Fellows Mobility Program’, marked the first collaboration in a landmark three-year series of exchanges involving the Conservatoire National Superieur de Musique et de Danse de Paris, the Universitat fur Musik und darstellende Kunst Wien, and The Juilliard School. These exchanges have been designed to foster an educational and artistic experience that embraced the learning process at the heart of each institution. A 10-day chamber music seminar, hosted by each institution in turn during the three-year period, incorporated five students from each visiting institution into a chamber music event at the host school.

The seminar at Juilliard placed the 10 visiting students—from Austria, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Hungary, and Poland—into 4 chamber ensembles with 9 Juilliard students—from Canada, China, Germany, and the United States. These 4 ensembles joined 14 others that together made up the performers of ChamberFest 2006. ChamberFest is an opportunity for the serious chamber musicians at Juilliard to return to the school during the final week of the winter break for an intensive week of rehearsals and daily coaching on a substantial piece of chamber music. The second week of ChamberFest coincides with the reopening of the school, and the 18 ensembles perform in six concerts given during that week.

People continued to come from the U.S. Customs section in waves. When at last a tall young man emerged with a cello strapped to his back, accompanied by four other people carrying cases for violins, a bassoon, and a trumpet, we saw the looks of relief that spread across their weary faces as they spotted us, and we knew that the SYLFF fellows from the Universitat fur Musik und darstellende Kunst Wien had finally arrived. They were greeted in German by Juilliard graduate and cellist Sabine Frick, escorted to the waiting bus, and whisked off to Juilliard. Our five guests from the Conservatoire National Superieur de Musique et de Danse de Paris arrived shortly thereafter, easily identified by their cases for clarinet, trombone, violin, viola, and cello. This group was greeted in French by Juilliard graduate and harpist Sivan Magen, and then also whisked off to Juilliard. The 10 musicians settled into Juilliard’s residence hall in rooms on the 22nd and 29th floors, which offer spectacular views of New York City and the nearby Hudson River, and then went for dinner in the school’s cafeteria with the Juilliard students. I was profoundly moved by the enthusiasm and sincerity of our guests, and I was eager to see what their collaboration with our students would bring.

Days later, I found myself wandering about on Juilliard’s 5th floor, delighted to hear strains of Charles Ives, Antonin Dvor˘ak, Igor Stravinsky, and recent Juilliard alumnus Jefferson Friedman emerging from the studios where the SYLFF ensembles rehearsed. The works by these four composers had been requested by the Juilliard students due to the latter’s desire to share music that represented their own interests and Juilliard’s chamber music traditions. As the days passed, students and faculty alike popped into my office during their breaks, with huge smiles on their faces as they described the joy of discovery, the exhaustion from the long hours of work they were undertaking, and the immense satisfaction of making new friends with each other. Juilliard cello-faculty member Bonnie Hampton perhaps expressed it best when she described the group she coached, saying,

“They were the best group I have had the pleasure of working with at Julliard in terms of attitude, and they were extremely fine players. The other remarkable thing is that they did not know each other at all prior to coming to the Juilliard program, but they worked together extremely well, seriously, and very professionally, and they also seemed to like and enjoy each other. Putting three unknowns together is always a “chance” and this one came up ‘golden.’ None of the musicians had played the Ives Trio before, and they were extremely open and receptive to working with his musical language. It was a real pleasure to work with this group.”

As the days of preparation came to a close, the students joined in our traditional end-of-week ChamberFest Chinese banquet. The marble floors resonated with the laughter and ebullient talk of the 90 ChamberFest participants, who consumed endless trays of lo mein noodles (stir-fried, Cantonese-style egg noodles), sautéed bok choy (Chinese chard), kung po chicken (diced chicken sautéed with sweet peppers and peanuts in spicy pepper sauce), and tofu with mushrooms, among the more than 40 dishes offered. And as is traditional with the ChamberFest banquet, all of the leftovers were wrapped up and given to the students to take back to the residence hall to share in late-night snacking together. This traditional sharing of abundant food from another culture seemed to be a delicious and fitting way to mark the SYLFF exchange as the students prepared for their performance several days hence.

Violinist Elenore Darmon noted,

It [the seminar] was very beneficial because we were put into a situation that one often encounters in a musician’s life: preparing in 10 days a work (contemporary in my case) without knowing one’s partners, and working intensively in order to construct a unity of sound and intonation, and all the while exchanging approaches to the work and choosing an interpretation that pleases each person. And it was also very good for my English!

Juilliard percussionist Luke Rinderknecht remarked,

“Working with the students from Vienna and Paris was certainly an exciting learning experience. Our rehearsals were complicated by language challenges, but with perseverance we learned “L’Histoire du Soldat” and a little of each other’s languages. Our concepts of sound were somewhat different, but through discussions about the educational and musical difference in our various countries I began to understand why that was so. It was a thoroughly fulfilling experience.”

But it was clarinetist Maguy Girard who perhaps summed it up the best, when she said that she

“left home with my clarinets, new tour books, and a new pair of shoes. Result: my tour books are now dog-eared . . . and my shoes have no soles! And the most important thing: I exchanged magnificent musical moments with students from three different nationalities (American, Austrian, and Hungarian). It was during this kind of experience that one can truly realize that music is universal, and especially that it is a language: one can communicate and share emotions without speaking the same verbal language.”

For me, being given the opportunity to observe these collaborations, it was a joy to meet the young people from Europe, entrusted to Juilliard for a too-brief period of time, to see the friendships that began within our walls, and to hear the indescribably beautiful music that resulted. I have also been privileged to make new musical friends myself: early-morning phone conversations across the Atlantic with Paris Conservatoire Deputy Director for External Affairs and Communication Gretchen Amussen introduced me to a soul mate in dreaming and planning for this project, and countless exchanges of e-mail messages with Vienna University’s distinguished professor Wolfgang Klos, whose generosity and energy marked this collaboration. I also gained new friends at The Nippon Foundation and other affiliated organizations: Mr. Yohei Sasakawa, Mr. Tatsuya Tanami, Ms. Kazuko Shiomi, Ms. Ellen Mashiko, Mr. Keita Sugai, and Ms. Takako Nakayama, who bestowed upon Juilliard the honor of their presence at the concert of the SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar at The Juilliard School. Their vision, hailed by Juilliard President Joseph W. Polisi, to nurture future leaders who will transcend geopolitical, ethnic, cultural, religious, and other boundaries for the betterment of humankind has found a home in the performing arts communities of the Vienna Universitat, Paris Conservatoire, and The Juilliard School.

The days passed far too quickly. As the students in turn strode onstage before the packed hall and shared their music, the audience cheered their approval, and I began to dream of the next exchange: Paris in January 2007. It cannot come too soon.

 

Bärli Nugent

Dr. Bärli Nugent is assistant dean, director of chamber music, and a faculty member of The Juilliard School, where she also administers Juilliard’s Mentoring, Scholastic Distinction, and Colloquium programs. She received her bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Juilliard, as well as a doctorate from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. A founding member of the Aspen Wind Quintet, winners of the 1984 Naumburg Chamber Music Award, she has performed in more than 1,000 concerts with the quintet throughout the United States, Europe, the former Soviet Union, and North Africa. She is also an artist-faculty member and director of chamber music for the Aspen Music Festival and School. She was instrumental in planning and running the SYLFF Chamber Music Seminar, in collaboration with her counterparts from the two other SYLFF-endowed music schools.

New Global Leadership as a Guardian of Human Rights and Human Security

July 15, 2008
By 20992

Mr. Svilanovic chairs Working Table I [Democratization and Human Rights], Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe. He served as the minister of foreign affairs of Serbia and Montenegro from 2000 to 2004. He received a SYLFF fellowship in 1990–1991 while working on his master’s thesis in civil procedure at the University of Belgrade.

 

Human Security: A Vague Concept

It is common knowledge that maintaining the territorial security of nation-states through military power has failed to improve their total human condition. In response, the international community has moved to combine economic development with military security and other basic human rights to form a new concept of "human security." Unfortunately, by common assent the concept lacks either a clear definition or any agreed-upon measure of it. Some commentators argue that human security represents a new paradigm for scholars and practitioners alike. Despite these claims, however, it remains uncertain whether the concept of human security can serve as a practical guide for academic research or governmental policymaking, simply because not all neologisms are equally plausible or useful.

 

The Reality concerning Human Security

Sometimes reality is so brutal and so obvious that neither academic definitions nor a consensus is needed in order to conclude that someone’s security and basic human needs and rights are being severely jeopardized. The international community has no clue about how to improve the situations in Iraq and Afghanistan, which are among the world’s 10 most-insecure countries for living, sharing the top-worst-10 positions with 8 countries in Africa. In Iraq and Afghanistan efforts are being made, not only through humanitarian operations but via a military presence, intended to impose some kind of democratic regime. So what can we expect from common efforts to root out poverty and fatal but curable diseases in Africa?

 

A Call for New Global Leadership

Obviously, what is needed is new global leadership with a new approach, presented by different actors in the political and social arenas, that can set deeper the roots of our commonly shared values where they have already been seeded, as in Eastern Europe, but even more important, to work out how we can spread the seeds of the crops we cultivate to where the soil is not yet ready but where many would benefit from their yields, as in Africa. Whether we want it or not, whether we like it or not, whether we see it as a paradox or not, we are jumping into a global order that is not so obvious, that no one fully understands. Whether we understand this new order or not is one issue, but we almost have no choice but to cope with this situation, because it influences our daily lives. It would be good if we would learn more about globalization trends, because this knowledge might help us to know how to conduct our lives under the new circumstances. In contrast to what one might rely on and assume as given, human-rights protection, sustainable peace, development and social cohesion, which are the main features of human security, are not only a matter of concern for national and international decision-makers, but are first and foremost the responsibility of every citizen.

 

The Side Effects of Economic Growth

We can say with great certainty that the foundations of our society have been severely shaken by the economic, social, and cultural revolutions of the later part of the 20th century. A great many of the solutions and structures that existed in the past have been destroyed by the extraordinary dynamism of the economy in which we live. This is throwing an increasing number of men and women into a situation in which they cannot appeal to clear norms, perspectives, and common values, in which they do not know what to do with their individual and collective existence. This is true of institutions such as the family, but also of political institutions that were the foundation of our civilization—the public sphere. Politics, parties, newspapers, organizations, representative assemblies, and states—none of these operate as they used to and as we had supposed they would continue to operate for a long time to come. At present there are no global-scale regulations or institutions that say what we should do or should not do regarding some of the newly emerging challenges, such as the fight against terrorism and nuclear proliferation. In the case of Kosovo, for instance, the current international community is divided on how to resolve the situation. Meanwhile, more often than we would like, we find ourselves without clearly applicable laws that, in this period of global transition and transformation, must be replaced by deeply rooted and widely accepted values and principles to guide us forward. The modern economy cannot operate endlessly without some kind of reference to social traditions and to a new set of values and patterns for collective actions, including those to promote social cohesion and education for democratic citizenship.

 

Potential Leaders to Improve Human Security

Globally cherished icons can dramatically improve human security. Instead of presenting any conclusion that should contain a definition of what new global leaders who might become guardians of improvement of human security worldwide should be, let me draw your attention to the work of one of today’s top fashion models, Liya Kebede from Ethiopia, whose annual earnings total millions of U.S. dollars. Most of you know her from the cover pages of VOGUE magazine, but she has also created the Liya Kebede Foundation dedicated to the welfare of mothers and children (see http://www.liyakebede.com/foundation/lkfoundationhome.html), and she is a WHO Goodwill Ambassador for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health. Her foundation’s mission is to raise awareness of the need to improve the conditions of mothers and children and to fight the horrible facts that each day an average of 1,600 mothers die from complications related to pregnancy and childbirth, and that nearly 11 million children die each year before they reach their fifth birthday, including 4 million who die within the first 28 days of life. Liya is not only a goodwill ambassador who serves as a good example for other influential global celebrities who easily attract public attention, but she is becoming a real global leader herself and a guardian of human security in Africa.

Thank you.

Reflections on the Sylff Program

July 15, 2008
By null

The Sylff Program’s mission―

“To support the education of outstanding students pursuing graduate- level study in the social sciences and humanities who have high

potential for leadership and a commitment to exercising leadership

in local, national, regional and international affairs, in public as well

as in private endeavors. To nurture future leaders who will transcend

geopolitical, religious, ethnic, cultural and other boundaries and will

contribute to peace and the well-being of humankind.

―recognizes the important role of graduate-level (or postgraduate level) study and its impact and ripple-effect throughout all sectors of societies, including the corporate, education, government and non-government sectors. It targets the social sciences and humanities (and performing arts at specific institutions) rather than the natural and applied sciences which not only receive the bulk of funding but generally more public attention.

While focusing on academically outstanding students, the Sylff mission expects that fellowships will be awarded to students with a high potential for and commitment to exercising leadership in local, national, regional and[/or] international arenas, and in ways that benefit the well-being of all and hence contribute to the common good. In sum, recipients of Sylff fellowships (“Sylff fellows”) are expected to complete the degree or program for which the fellowship was awarded and then pursue their careers and personal lives in socially responsible ways and to lead others in doing so. It is a tall order but one which is filled by innumerable Sylff fellows throughout the world.

There are many “stories to tell” of individuals and groups of fellows who are fulfilling the Sylff mission and living its vision―the founder of a scholarship program which enables youngsters from rural villages to attend high school and requires them to return home to teach villagers in their respective dialects during vacation periods; a recent foreign minister and now a leader in a turbulent region; a group of junior university faculty members who have helped transform an impoverished community through an environmental project; young musicians who organize and perform charity concerts to benefit orphanages; and much more. Their stories underscore the fact that Sylff fellows indeed act and have an impact far beyond the Sylff community.

The engine which drives the Sylff Program is its endowment scheme. Rather than the donor (The Nippon Foundation) or the program administrator (The Tokyo Foundation) receiving applications from individuals, universities throughout the world are invited to submit applications to receive endowments or permanent funds of US$1 million each. Selected institutions then invest and manage their Sylff endowments, and use the earnings on their investments to provide Sylff fellowships to graduate-level, enrolled students thus empowering the universities and allowing them to plan over the long-term because they have a sustainable source of revenue. In other words, the endowment scheme generates ownership and takes away uncertainty so a stable program can be planned and implemented.

The Sylffinstitutions also decide on the academic disciplines or themes of their fellowship programs. Examples of theme-based fellowship programs include “Pluralisms, Conflict Resolution and Democratic Governance” (Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia) and “Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Socio-economic, Political and Cultural Dimensions of Human Development” (Jawaharlal Nehru University, India). There are also mechanisms for endowed-universities to alter the academic disciplines or themes of their fellowship programs after a period of time to meet changing needs and priorities.

The lubricants which have helped keep the engine running are the so-called follow-up programs implemented by The Tokyo Foundation for enrolled and graduated Sylff fellows and endowed-university administrators, and online and face-to-face contact which have fostered a sense of belonging and ownership of the Sylff Program by all and mutual trust. Even hybrid vehicles require lubricants to increase the ease of their functioning. In much the same way, the Sylff engine requires lubricants not only to improve its functioning but also to help ensure that the engines power Sylff vehicles to follow a mutual road map (mission) to reach an ultimate goal (vision).

There are currently 68 endowed universities and consortia in 44 countries that make up a colorful parade of Sylff vehicles of different years, makes and models but they share a fundamental commitment to academic excellence and educating and nurturing the next generations to help ensure that the world will be a better place for all. Sylff vehicles travel different roads―some smooth and straight, others filled with pot-holes and sometimes requiring detours―but they are headed in the same direction.

I vividly recall attending a meeting of representatives of African NGOs and U.S. foundations several years ago in New York City. Although I was an observer, I was called upon to introduce the Sylff Program. The first question which I received from a foundation representative was, “Do you actually trust all of the universities to manage their endowments and to administer their fellowship programs?” The second interjection came from a representative of an African NGO who clapped her hands and said, “That’s just what we need, not vast amounts but permanent funds that will enable us to develop and implement strategic plans, and sustain and nurture our organization’s projects. We are responsible people and want to be trusted and encouraged.”

It took some discipline for me to stifle a clap and cheer while first explaining that the foundation and prospective recipient universities engage in considerable discussion about where and how the endowment will be invested, transparent and equitable administration and focus of the fellowship program, participation in the Sylff network, and the submission of annual reports. Then I said clearly, mostly for the U.S. foundation representatives, yes, we trust the universities―the endowment is theirs, in perpetuity, barring any gross mismanagement and the foundations’ (donor and program administrator) commitment to the universities and fellows is life-long.

This and many other first-hand experiences have underscored that the Sylff Program is based upon and thrives on mutual learning, trust and collaboration between and among the foundations (The Nippon Foundation and The Tokyo Foundation), endowed universities and the more than 10,000 Sylff fellows.

 

Thinking and acting outside the box

In the case of the Sylff Program, thinking and acting outside the proverbial box is not simply an exercise but lies within its very essence. In 1986, then The Nippon Foundation President Yohei Sasakawa made a significant leap outside the prevailing box when he transformed his father’s vision into the Sylff Program, then a rare case for a private Japanese grant-making foundation. Twenty-two years later, it is still rare for foundations in and outside Japan to endow universities, particularly in developing countries.

Mr. Sasakawa’s strong commitment and belief in the program led him to take another big step when he led efforts by The Nippon Foundation to establish and fund The Tokyo Foundation in 1997, first and foremost to strengthen and enhance the Sylff Program and secondarily other scholarship activities (by the new foundation’s Scholarship Division), and to engage in policy studies (Research Division). (At the time, the Japanese government was limiting the number of new foundations hence the scholarship and research initiatives were joined into a single organization.)

During the second decade of Sylff, he continued to be a generous source of support and inspiration. Combined with the expertise and guidance of the Scholarship Programs Advisory Board (previously called the International Advisory Committee), the Sylff Program continued to innovate and translate the Sylff vision and mission into follow-up programs and activity, including the building of the Sylff Network, the mechanism that allows the Sylff community to keep the engines running at best levels of performance.

Sylff institutions not only participated in and facilitated follow-up programs but some also initiated and engaged in university-to-university and in some cases, consortium programs and activity with funding from sources other than Sylff. In other words, they too explicitly or implicitly thought and acted outside the box. A dozen universities have also hosted various forums and meetings and thus made incalculable in-kind contributions.

During the same period, a growing number of Sylff fellows actively participated in follow-up programs, including the Sylff Fellows Council. Through their research, social action and networking initiatives, they too innovated, experimented and acted on top of their ongoing academic work, and professional and personal responsibilities. They deserve a loud round of applause not only for multi-tasking but also for leading and serving as role models for others within and beyond the Sylff community.

For all stakeholders, thinking and acting outside the box involved both process and content matters―taking bold steps in making processes participatory and more transparent, and designing follow-up programs and activity to facilitate trans-disciplinary, trans-national research and social action.

 

Moving forward

The Sylff Program is not perfect nor a panacea for all ills. It is a living system and thus a work-in-progress that requires ongoing reexamination, fine-tuning and transformation if it is to strengthen, grow and mature. There are various mechanisms to reexamine and fine-tune existing programs and activity, such as self-study techniques. However, transformation in the context of higher education, and thus of Sylff, goes beyond the rational processes and substance of assessment and cost-benefit analyses. As Richard H. Hersh recently wrote, “Transformation is about intellectual deepening and broadening; …rigorous and humble introspection; …encountering the great human conversations as a means of learning how to construct meaning in far more defensible and rigorous ways. [And] learning―and the transformation it fosters―is never strictly cognitive….Learning is about being able to link thought and emotion, and all with action, in ways that are humane, caring and responsible” (The Chronicle of Higher Education, August 1, 2008, p. A64 ).

On the world stage, the Sylff family of fellows, universities and the foundations may be a modest company of actors in terms of numbers but together and through individual endeavors the clan can make a difference. A quarter century ago, scientist Lewis Thomas wrote in a collection of essays:

“Altruism, in its biological sense, is required of us. We have an enormous family to look after, or perhaps that assumes too much, making us sound like official gardeners and zookeepers for the planet, responsibilities for which we are probably not grown-up enough. We may need new technical terms for concern, respect, affection, substitutes for altruism. But at least we should acknowledge the family ties and, with them, the obligations. If we do it wrong, scattering pollutants, clouding the atmosphere with too much carbon dioxide, extinguishing the thin carapace of ozone, burning up the forests, dropping the bombs, rampaging at large through nature as though we owned the place, there will be a lot of paying back to do and, at the end, nothing to pay back with.” (Late Night Thoughts on Listening to Mahler’s Ninth Symphony, 1983, pp. 106-107).

What will the Sylff family choose to do in its third decade? Commit to further mutual learning, collaborative action and transforming challenges into opportunities? Do “good” but in seclusion or for self-serving purposes? Slip into indifference, complacency and inactivity? Do we have a choice?

The SYLFF Asia/Pacific Regional Forum: Reliving the Event

July 15, 2008
By 21158

Sherilyn Siy (standing), a member of the SYLFF Fellows Council, leading a workshop.

Sherilyn Siy (standing), a member of the SYLFF Fellows Council, leading a workshop.

The summer of 2006 was passing as a usual Kolkata summer for us at Jadavpur University (JU). The heat and the dust were taking their toll on everybody, and occasional rainstorms brought only temporary relief. Each of us in the JU-SYLFF family was following his or her usual routine —research, teaching, association activities, reviews, and so on. Little did we know that very soon we would receive a big surprise and then be facing an even bigger challenge. Very soon we would be migrating from the local arena to the global domain, from the mundane to the unusual.

On one of those hot and dusty days, the JU-SYLFF project director, Prof. Joyashree Roy, called an emergency meeting of JU’s SYLFF fellows. Each one of us thought that the meeting would be another routine one at which we would have to inform her about the progress of the association’s activities. We had no reason to be apprehensive; we had meticulously charted our progress. But the meeting turned out to reveal a complete surprise for all of us.

At the meeting, Prof. Roy informed us that the Scholarship Division, in a letter to the vice chancellor of the university, had requested JU to host the SYLFF Asia/ Pacific Regional Forum in November 2007. Prof. Roy asked us what our reaction was to this proposal. We were spellbound. We knew that the scale of the program was very large, and we were not sure if we were prepared for it. At the same time, we were proud that our university had been asked to host this mega-event. It was a big honor—but an even bigger responsibility. Unanimously, we voiced our consent— knowing well that we were facing a big challenge. But each of us was determined to make the best effort to turn the event into a grand success.

Life was never the same thereafter. Days were spent making decisions about activities, responsibilities, deadlines, and teams. All of us knew that the planning had to be meticulous and that we must learn to work together. Since that summer of 2006, every member of the JU-SYLFF family made the maximum effort possible for the cause of the forum. The fellows not only worked overtime, but did so with determination and zeal that knew no bounds. The JU-SYLFF project director and the SYLFF steering committee members constantly worked as a guiding force —setting targets, regularly monitoring progress, and making critical decisions on a daily basis. We received unstinted support from numerous people at the university. There was a palpable enthusiasm within the university’s academic community regarding the theme of the forum: Human Rights and Creative Leadership. India, whose economy is one of the fastest-growing in the world, is faced with the critical task of guaranteeing human rights for its huge population. The social sciences faculty and their students wanted to learn from the experiences of other nations—a prospect that the forum assured. Also, the prospect for deliberating on the many facets of creative leadership in the context of human rights in various economies, in different phases of development, was extremely exciting to many in the JU academic community.

The support that we received from the Scholarship Division was tremendous. The tool kit that the division provided for organizing the forum made our work simpler than it otherwise would have been. The kit charted out the major activities and important timelines. Quick decisions, constructive suggestions, and timely reminders flowed constantly from the Scholarship Division, which always responded within 24 hours to our questions and concerns—whether it was a weekday or a weekend. And each response was filled with encouragement and enthusiastic support for our endeavors.

A lot of work had to be done— arranging the venue and accommodations for the guests, preparing the program schedule, arranging city tours and visits to sites for social action, and so on. The university extended its help to us, thereby facilitating our completion of these tasks. Soon after the local associations and the SYLFF institutions finalized the list of participants, we started working on the participants’ travel schedules. This involved coordinating with almost 60 people from different countries. Each participant was extremely cooperative, accommodating some odd requests from us and greatly easing our work. We constantly felt that we were working as part of one big family within which distance, geographical boundaries, or differences in languages did not matter; what mattered was the success of a common cause.

The forum was held November 20th–22nd, 2007, at JU. I was fortunate to participate in the forum. I wish to take this opportunity to thank all the members of the JU-SYLFF association who selected me as an official participant from JU. Participating in the forum was indeed a once-in-a-lifetime experience —meeting people from diverse cultures, interacting and exchanging ideas with members of a worldwide academic community, and most importantly, making friends with people from different countries.

The three days of the forum were characterized by intense discussions on the forum’s theme. The oral and poster presentations focused on the issue of human rights and how creative leadership can create and sustain an enabling environment for realizing human rights. The spirited keynote speech by Dr. Egla Martinez- Salazar (a SYLFF Prize winner) raised a critical question: Who benefits from the existing sociopolitical and legal structures and human rights activities? With this important question as a backdrop, the participants discussed the role of education, economic development, culture, politics, governance, and civil society as means for creating an environment that supports human rights. The discussions revealed that besides considering the fundamental human factors while embarking on any human rights related activity, it is also necessary to do a cost-benefit analysis of any strategy intended to ensure human rights. The discussions also brought forward the fact that creative leaders can exist in different spheres of an economy, society, and polity, and that each leader can contribute in her or his own ways (large or small) to strengthen the forces that are vital for realizing human rights. Case studies and reports of different countries’ experiences stressed the role of creative leaders as agents of change.

The discussions at the forum revealed that the concept of human rights has a trans-disciplinary dimension to it. This topic must be moved from the domain of lawyers to the realms of various disciplines, so that feasible and holistic solutions to human rights problems can be obtained. The forum was instrumental in reshaping the way that many of us think and act.

The forum also gave the participating fellows an opportunity to learn about networking. The coordinators, Ms. Jeanne Ing Lee and Ms. Sherilyn Siy, acting on behalf of the SYLFF Fellows Council, took great care to conduct memorable sessions where the participants learned how to build successful and effective networks. The fellows shared the best practices of their networks and the steps they have taken to promote team-building and collaboration. These best practices can become models for creating sustainable networks that are spirited and performing.

Starting in the summer of 2006, our journey to the SYLFF Asia/Pacific Regional Forum in the winter of 2007 was an extremely thrilling and rewarding experience. That journey taught us fundamental skills for organizing an international event. We have also benefited academically—through the rich discussions on economic, social, political, and cultural aspects of human rights.

As a result of that journey and the forum, the SYLFF fellows at JU hope to host another SYLFF regional forum sometime in the future.

Report on an Indonesian Seminar on Community-based Disaster Management: “Developing Community Independence in Facing Natural Disasters”

July 15, 2008
By null

(The following is an excerpt from the SYLFF Newsletter No.17, Jan 2007)

Andri Rosadi and Jiah Fauziah

The great tsunami that hit Aceh, in Sumatra, Indonesia, and several other areas in the world on December 26th, 2004, and that killed hundreds of thousands of people, has been followed by many other natural disasters in Indonesia. Two months after the tsunami, Nias Island suffered from a big earthquake that also killed people and destroyed houses. Then on May 27, 2006, Yogyakarta, one of the most important cities in Java, was also shaken by a great earthquake from the south while people were anticipating the eruption of a volcano located north of the city. About two months later, a tsunami hit Pangandaran and some other southern areas of Java. Actually, during the above-mentioned time many more earthquakes occurred in other parts of Indonesia, but fortunately they did not cause much damage for people. Nonetheless, all these disasters made many Indonesian people aware that they live on moving lands that might experience many more such serious calamities.

The earthquake disaster that occurred in May 2006 in Yogyakarta, the city where our SYLFF institution, Gadjah Mada University is located, was the main inspiration for the seminar. That earthquake caused more than six thousand deaths and reduced thousands of houses to ruins. When responding to such a tragedy, one important thing to consider is how to develop the independence of the community for facing any future disaster it might experience. This was highlighted in the case of the aforementioned disaster because the victims had to rely on the local government of Yogyakarta, who were themselves too dependent on central government when it came to aiding victims. Moreover, although it is true that the victims needed assistance from all parts of society, when assistance from others is believed to be the only solution, the result is a mental dependence on the part of the victims, along with other consequences that negatively affect the post-disaster reconstruction process. It appears that such was the case in Yogyakarta. Several months after the great calamity, people still seem to be suffering and longing for help.

Based on this reality, the SYLFF Fellows Association of Gadjah Mada University held the aforementioned seminar regarding the problem. It is expected that the seminar results will be used as input for various relevant segments of society. The association invited two speakers to the seminar: Dr. P. M. Laksono, an anthropologist and lecturer in the Faculty of Cultural Sciences at Gadjah Mada University, and Ms. Estuning Tyas, a current SYLFF fellow and graduate student at Gadjah Mada University, specializing in disaster management.

In his talk, Dr. Laksono commented on the slow reaction of both local and central government in responding to the disaster. The local government relied on the central one, whereas in this case, disaster response was mainly the responsibility of the local government, because the impact of the May 2006 disaster was regional, in contrast to the case of the tsunami that hit Aceh, causing a disaster that was national in scope. In this situation, according to Laksono, the factor that ended up playing the most important role was the media. Thanks to their nationwide and worldwide networks, they succeeded in raising public awareness and support on a widespread level, resulting in the huge amount of help received. Nevertheless, Laksono also criticized the media for their tendency to present the news in a way that created bias and adversely influenced how people regarded the disaster.

Besides the media, there are several other elements of the community that play important roles in responding to disasters. These elements are informal and outside the governmental structure, usually offering help spontaneously and based solely on humanitarianism. Their weakness lies in lack of organizational management, which often results in many obstacles to their being able to help effectively. One of the obstacles is corruption or deviousness on the part of some parties that use the disaster situation for their own benefit.

Nonetheless, the effectiveness of certain groups in the community has proved to significantly contribute to assisting the disaster victims and lessening their suffering. Based on this fact, what needs to be done in the future is to further develop such community-based disaster response measures and to learn from past problems.

In regard to community-based disaster response measures, one thing that must be emphasized in advance is the empowerment of the overall society in the handling of a disaster. This must be based on the ability and potential of the society. The main obstacle in this regard is that a society usually breaks apart when a disaster occurs, making it impossible for the full ability and potential of the society to be utilized to solve problems. Another obstacle is that the people tend to forget the disaster very quickly, so that they do not anticipate future disasters. If disasters are experienced so frequently, a society should realize that it needs to formulate a model for handling disasters in ways that rely mostly on the society’s own capabilities and potential. However, this is still yet to happen.

The other speaker, Estuning Tyas, emphasized the need to socialize disaster knowledge in the community. It is a fact that people in Indonesian villages, who generally have a low level of education, do not have enough knowledge about disasters. This limits both their view of disasters and their ability to handle their own problems in a disaster situation.

To increase the ability of a community to handle a disaster, Estuning discussed several steps that Eko Teguh Paripurno, a disaster-relief/crisis-management expert, has suggested: (1) Identify potential disaster areas; (2) Map these disaster areas; (3) Identify specific danger-areas and the possible risks associated with them; (4) Identify the socio-cultural characteristics of the communities in the danger-areas; (5) Formulate procedures and identify steps to be taken in dealing with the disasters; (6) Develop the social systems to help people to learn how to anticipate and handle disasters, based on the potential and strengths of their community; and (7) Develop natural-disaster prevention and response technologies. In order to make all these steps community based, they must include the involvement of the community: together by and for the members of the community, not only by experts and the government.

An additional important point to be considered here is that disaster education is still not included in schools’ curricula in Indonesia. Similarly, at the family level, children have not been taught to recognize, understand, and deal with disasters. Therefore, the first and most important step to implement all the following steps, is to educate people, especially villagers, to make them aware of the socio-geographical condition of their locales in regard to possible disasters. To be effective, this educational model must use many kinds of engaging media, such as films, to deliver the message.

In brief, both Estuning Tyas and Laksono emphasized the need for disaster education in order for a community to increase awareness of its own strengths and weaknesses so that it can handle its own problems if a disaster occurs. As a follow-up to the discussion, the SYLFF Fellows Association of Gadjah Mada University plans to organize some social action projects aimed at educating people in villages around Yogyakarta so that they can recognize their own potential for handling any disasters that might befall them. Fortunately, the SYLFF fellows of Gadjah Mada University have different academic backgrounds: economics, cultural studies, political science, geography, and conflict resolution. Such a combination of multi-disciplinary backgrounds holds great potential for engaging in a variety of actions reflecting different approaches.

The actions are planned to involve formal and informal measures. Formally, the association will provide disaster education in schools and for some small community groups. Informally, it will hold some community entertainment programs that will indirectly educate a larger number of people. It is hoped that these actions will greatly contribute to the communities’ ability to effectively deal with disasters.

 

Andri Rosadi

Andri Rosadi

Andri graduated with a major in Islamic civilization from the University of Al-Azhar, Cairo, in 2003, and received an MA in anthropology from Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, in 2006, in which he was supported by a SYLFF Fellowship. He has worked in several organizations, including Ikatan Cendekiawan Muslim Indonesia and Muhammadiyah Student, both based in Cairo, as a coordinator. He was a teacher in Medan, North Sumatra, in 1996, in Kediri, East Java, in 1997, and in Yogyakarta, in 2003–04. Since 2004, he has been involved in community development work in Ngaglik Village, Sleman, Yogyakarta.

 

Jiah Fauziah

Jiah Fauziah

Jiah graduated with a major in English from Gadjah Mada University in 1999, and earned a master’s degree in linguistics from the same university, for which she was awarded a SYLFF Fellowship.